Hyperlawhypertext legal database Stevens v. Coolidge 138 N.Y.S. 1144

← Cases

Stevens v. Coolidge

138 N.Y.S. 1144 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1912-12-06 English

Decision Majority — PER CURIAM. · Dissent — INGRAHAM, P. J.

Contents
p. 1144
STEVENS v. COOLIDGE et al.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
December 6, 1912.)

Headnote

Appeal from Special Term, New York County. Action by Emily C. Stevens against Henry Coolidge and others. Fromi a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Affirmed.
F. L. Crocker and J. C. Mayers, of New York City, for appellants.
G. D. Lamb, of New York City, for respondent.

Judgment affirmed with costs.

I dissent, on the ground that no lien on the Stock Exchange seat was established, and that, considering the nature of a Stock Exchange seat, there was no property to which a lien could attach.