Hyperlawhypertext legal database Summo v. Snare & Triest Co. 138 N.Y.S. 1145

← Cases

Summo v. Snare & Triest Co.

138 N.Y.S. 1145 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1912-12-13 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1145
SUMMO, Respondent, v. SNARE & TRIEST CO. et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
December 13, 1912.)

Headnote

Action by Vitacreseenza Summo, as administratrix, against the Snare & Triest Company and another.
H. M. Hitchings, of New
York City, for appellants.
W. F. Unger, of New York City, for respondent.

Order modified, by striking from the order for examination the provision authorizing an examination with respect to the matters set out in the affidavit and in subdivisions 1 ad 9 of said order. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.