Hyperlawhypertext legal database Connell v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. 141 N.Y.S. 1113

← Cases

Connell v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.

141 N.Y.S. 1113 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1913-04-25 English

Decision Majority — PER CURIAM. · Dissent — JENKS, P. J., and CARR, J.,

Contents
p. 1113
CONNELL, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
April 25, 1913.)

Headnote

Action by Katherine Con
p. 1114
nell, as administratrix, against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. See, also, 145 App. Div. 939 , 130 N. Y. Supp. 1108 .

dissent, upon the ground that, inasmuch as the case was submitted to the jury upon the question of constructive notice to the defendant, the evidence was not sufficient to establish that fact.