Majority
p. 1125JARVIS v. DAVISON. (Supreme,Court, Appellate Division, Second Department. March 28, 1913.)
Headnote
Action by Howard B. Jarvis-against Estelle J. Davison.Action dismissed, upon the ground that no person .interested and entitled to enforce the restriction is a party to the controversy, and that without such presence a decision as to them would be inoperative, and upon the further ground that the submission is not properly acknowledged.