Hyperlawhypertext legal database Brill v. Hodgens 143 N.Y.S. 1107

← Cases

Brill v. Hodgens

143 N.Y.S. 1107 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1913-10-17 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1107
BRILL, Appellant, v. HODGENS, Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
October 17, 1913.)

Headnote

Actiàu by Raphael Brill against Thomas M. Hodgens. A. Benedict, of New York City, for appellant. A. B. King, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion to vacate order for examination denied, with $10 costs, the date for the examination of defendant to be fixed on settlement of order. Settle order on notice.