Hyperlawhypertext legal database Hirschfield v. Keith & Proctor Amusement Co. 143 N.Y.S. 1122

← Cases

Hirschfield v. Keith & Proctor Amusement Co.

143 N.Y.S. 1122 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1913-11-14 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1122
HIRSCHFIELD, Appellant v. KEITH & PROCTOR AMUSEMENT CO., Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
November 14, 1913.)

Headnote

Action by Annie Hirschfield against the Keith & Proctor Amusement Company. D. 3. Miller, of New York City, for appellant. L. F. Fish, of New York City, for respondent

No opinion. Order reversed, motion granted, and complaint dismissed, unless plaintiff pays the costs of the former action within 30 days from the date of service of the order of this court on her, in which case the motion will be denied, with $10 costs. No costs of this appest Settle order on notice.