Hyperlawhypertext legal database Ginsberg v. Wolf 144 N.Y.S. 679

← Cases

Ginsberg v. Wolf

144 N.Y.S. 679 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1913-12-05 English

Contents

Majority

p. 679
(159 App. Div. 414.)
GINSBERG v. WOLF et al.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
December 5, 1913.)

Headnote

Appeal from Trial Term, New -York County.
Action by Rachel Ginsberg against Harry Wolf and another, copartners doing business under the firm name and style of New York Embossing Company. From a judgment in favor of defendants and from an order denying motion for a new trial, they appeal.
Reversed, and new trial granted.
Argued before INGRAHAM, P. J., and CLARKE, SCOTT, DOWLING, and HOTCHKISS, JJ.
Walter L. Glenney, of New York City, for appellants.
E. Clyde Sherwood, of New York City, for respondent.

For the reasons stated in Harry Ginsberg v. Harry Wolf et al., 144 N. Y. Supp. 678 , decided herewith, the judgment and order appealed from are reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

INGRAHAM, P. J., dissents.