← Cases

Fowler v. Webb

145 N.Y.S. 1123 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1914-01-23 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1123
FOWLER et al., Respondents, v. WEBB et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
January 23, 1914.)

Headnote

Action by Clarence A. Fowler and another against Edwin J. Webb and others.

Order modified, so as to require the defendants to specify: First, the representations alleged to have been made by the plaintiffs to the defendants, which are claimed to he false, as set forth in the fourth paragraph'

p. 1124
of defendants’ answer, setting forth to whom made, by whom, the place, and approximately the time, and whether any of the statements were in writing; second, the amount paid for experts; third, approximately the location of the tunnel driven; ' fourth, approximately the number of borings that were made, and, as near as may be, when and where; fifth, what machinery, engine, or boilers were repaired, and the cost thereof; sixth, all sums of money paid out by defendants, together with the nature of such payments, by reason, of the false representations alleged in the answer. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs.