Hyperlawhypertext legal database Koropjeck v. Bohack 145 N.Y.S. 1129

← Cases

Koropjeck v. Bohack

145 N.Y.S. 1129 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1914-01-30 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1129
KOROPJECK v. BOHACK.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
January 30, 1914.)

Headnote

Appeal from Trial Term, New York County. Action by Tessie Koropjeck against Henry C. Bohack. From a judgment for plaintiff, and an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals. Affirmed. Marshall McLean, of New York City, for appellant. Louis Salant, of New York City, for respondent.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

INGRAHAM, P. J., and McLAUGHLIN, J., dissent, on the ground that it was error to refuse to charge the defendant’s fifth request, which is as follows: “The fact that Bennet was . not called by either side raises no more presumption in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant than it does in favor of the defendant and' against the plaintiff.’!