Hyperlawhypertext legal database Barkin Const. Co. v. Hershfield 146 N.Y.S. 1083

← Cases

Barkin Const. Co. v. Hershfield

146 N.Y.S. 1083 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1914-03-27 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1083
BARKIN CONST. CO., Appellant, v. HERSHFIELD et al., Respondents.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
March 27, 1914.)

Headnote

Action by the Barkin Construction Company against Henry G. Hershfield and others.
J. A. Seidman, of New York City, for appellant.
M. H. Cane, of New York City, for respondents.

No opinion. Order modified, by requiring defendants to pay all costs of action to date, to be taxed, and that the amendment shall be without prejudice to the position of the case on the calendar, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.