Majority
p. 1127MERUK et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department. April 24, 1914.)
Headnote
Action by William Maruk and another against the City of New York.Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. We are of opinion that thp proofs justified a recovery by plaintiffs to some substantial extent of damage, and that on these points the proofs were practically undisputed.