Majority
p. 343TITUS v. SPENCER. (Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department. May 7, 1914.)
Headnote
Witnesses (§ 159[1] )—Competency.In an action against the estate of a decedent, it is improper, under Code Civ. Proc. § 829, to allow plaintiff to testify as to the value of services rendered to the decedent.
[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Witnesses, Cent. Dig. §§ 629, 664, 666-669, 671-682; Dec. Dig. § 159.*]
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First District.
p. 344Argued April term, 1914, before GUY and WHITAKER, JJ.
Action by Edward C. Titus against Lydia A. Spencer, as executrix of the last will and testament of Armón Spencer, deceased. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
Reversed and remanded.
See, also, 145 N. Y. Supp. 40 .
William H. Darrow, of New York City, for appellant.
Booth & Ellis, of New York City, for respondent.
We think that it was error, to admit, over the objection of defendant, the evidence of the plaintiff as to the value of his services rendered to the deceased. Such testimony was within the inhibition of section 829 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
PAGE, J., taking no part.