Hyperlawhypertext legal database Spinelli v. McMullen, Snare & Treist, Inc. 148 N.Y.S. 211

← Cases

Spinelli v. McMullen, Snare & Treist, Inc.

148 N.Y.S. 211 Court Argued June term, 1914, before SEABURY, PAGE, and BIJUR, JJ. Decision date 1914-06-18 English

Contents

Majority

p. 211
SPINELLI v. McMULLEN, SNARE & TREIST, Inc.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.
June 18, 1914.)

Headnote

Master and Servant (§ 252[1] )—Injuries to Servant—Employers’ Liability Act.
Service .of notice in conformity with the statute is a condition precedent to the right of a servant to recover under the Employers’ Liability Act (Consol. Laws, c. 31, §§ 200-204).
[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Master and Servant, Cent. Dig. § 806; Dec. Dig. § 252.*]
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of the Bronx, Second District.
p. 212
Personal injury action by Alfonso Spinelli, by Fiore Spinelli, his guardian ad litem, against McMullen, Snare & Treist, Incorporated. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
Reversed, and complaint dismissed.
Argued June term, 1914, before SEABURY, PAGE, and BIJUR, JJ.
Halsey, Kiernan & O’Keefe, of New York City (John R. Halsey, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Domenick A. Montani, of New York City, for respondent.

The service of a notice in conformity to the statute was a condition precedent to the plaintiff's right to recover. The alleged notice served did not comply with the statute. Logerto v. Central Building Co., 198 N. Y. 390 , 91 N. E. 782 .

Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Cases cited