Hyperlawhypertext legal database American Slicing Mach. Co. v. Corkedale 149 N.Y.S. 1069

← Cases

American Slicing Mach. Co. v. Corkedale

149 N.Y.S. 1069 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1914-11-06 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1069
AMERICAN SLICING MACH. CO., Appellant, v. CORKEDALE, Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
November 6, 1914.)

Headnote

Action by the American Slicing Machine Company against Maxwell Corkedale.

Although we have repeatedly called attention to the rule requiring appellant to state facts showing that the appeal is a meritorious one, there has been no attempt to comply with this rule. In addition, no excuse is offered for appellant’s laches. The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, with $10 costs.