Hyperlawhypertext legal database Arroll v. Buffalo, L. & R. RY. CO. 149 N.Y.S. 1069

← Cases

Arroll v. Buffalo, L. & R. RY. CO.

149 N.Y.S. 1069 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1914-10-22 English

Contents
p. 1069
ARROLL, Respondent, v. BUFFALO, L. & R. RY. CO., Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
October 22, 1914.)

Headnote

Action by James T. Arroll against the Buffalo, Lockport & Rochester Railway Company.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. See, also, 160 App. Div. 915 , 145 N. Y. Supp. 1112 .

dissent, upon the ground that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence, and upon the further ground that the court committed reversible error in permitting the plaintiff to testify under defendant’s objection that the defendant’s claim agent Hoenig called upon him after the accident.