Hyperlawhypertext legal database Brown v. Rosenson 149 N.Y.S. 1073

← Cases

Brown v. Rosenson

149 N.Y.S. 1073 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1914-10-16 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1073
BROWN, Respondent, v. ROSENSON et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
October 16, 1914.)

Headnote

Action by Pierre M. Brown against Hyman Rosenson and another.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, upon the ground that the uncontradicted evidence is that the defendants falsely represented as to the car “that they were thoroughly acquainted with it and knew its condition, and that the machinery was in perfect condition and would need no repairing, and that said automobile needed no overhauling.”