Hyperlawhypertext legal database Housel v. Lehigh Valley R. 149 N.Y.S. 1088

← Cases

Housel v. Lehigh Valley R.

149 N.Y.S. 1088 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1914-10-07 English

Decision Majority — PER CURIAM. · Dissent — KRUSE, P. J.,

Contents
p. 1088
HOUSEL, Appellant, v. LEHIGH VALLEY R. CO., Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
October 7, 1914.)

Headnote

~?Action by Willis S. Housel, as administrator, etc., against the Lehigh Valley Railroad Company. -

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

dissents, upon the ground that tbe plainti~ made out a prima facie case under the federal Safety Appliance Act (II. S. Comp. St. 1913, §~ 8605-8612) and the federal Emniovers' Liability Act (U. S. Comp. St. 1913. $$ &657-$665).