Majority
p. 1100BRINKMAN, Appellant, v. PENNSYLVANIA R. CO., Respondent. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department. March 17, 1915.)
Headnote
Action by Michael ICearon Brink-man against the Pennsylvania Railroad Company.Judgment and order rev'ersed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the evidence presents a question of fact as to whether the defendant was negligent in failing to adopt a reasonable and proper system of inspection of the chains furnished plaintiff in the performance of his work.
FOOTE, J., dissents.