Hyperlawhypertext legal database Hirschkowitz v. Rosenkrantz 153 N.Y.S. 1120

← Cases

Hirschkowitz v. Rosenkrantz

153 N.Y.S. 1120 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1915-06-04 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1120
HIRSCHKOWITZ, Respondent, v. ROSENKRANTZ, Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
June 4, 1915.)

Headnote

Action by Rosie Hirschkowitz against Davis Rosenkrantz.

It would be difficult to conceive of a case of more unreasonable neglect on the part of the plaintiff herself and of her attorney to prosecute than appeared here. Meyer v. Crimmins, 135 App. Div. 911 , 120 N. Y. Supp. 353 . The plaintiff has by no means successfully explained that delay. Therefore the order appealed from is reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion to open the default and set aside the judgment is denied, with $10 costs.