Majority
p. 1140PFLUGER, Appellant, v. INTERBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT CO., Respondent. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department. July 30, 1915.)
Action by Matilda Pfluger against the Interborough Rapid Transit Company. No opinion. Under the proofs in this case, there was an issue for the jury whether warning was or should have been given, and whether plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. The judgment and order are therefore reversed, and a new trial granted; costs to abide the event.