Majority
p. 1106FILONCZUK v. INTERNATIONAL RY. CO. et al. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department. October 22, 1915.)
Headnote
Action by Michael Fionczuk against the I~ternational Railway Company and another.No opinion. Plaintiff's ezceptions sustained, and motion for a new trial granted, as to both defendants, with costs to plaintiff to abide event. Held, that on the evidence a question of fact as to each' defendant was presented, both as to defendant's negligence and plaintiff's contributory negligence.