Hyperlawhypertext legal database Hirsh & Schofield, Inc. v. Gusmer 156 N.Y.S. 1127

← Cases

Hirsh & Schofield, Inc. v. Gusmer

156 N.Y.S. 1127 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1915-12-10 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1127
HIRSH & SCHOFIELD, Inc., v. GUSMER.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
December 10, 1915.)

Headnote

Appeal from Special Term, New York County. Action by Hirsh & Schofield, Incorporated, against Aage Gusmer. From an order denying a motion for the continuance of a temporary injunction pendente lite, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed. See, also, 155 N. Y. Supp. 1113 .

Without determining whether or not the plaintiff would be entitled to an injunction by final judgment after a trial of the action, we think the court was justified in refusing to continue the temporary injunction. The order appealed from is therefore affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.