Majority
In his discretion, the court a Special Term declined to discharge from ai alimony order a defaulting defendant who, ii violation of our decree, had within three month remarried in New Jersey. Besides being a dis obedience, his act consisted also in taking or himself a new financial responsibility whicl tended to prevent him from paying the sums di rected for plaintiff’s support. His conduct therefore, cannot commend his appeal to a Net York court. Ryer v. Ryer, 33 Hun, 116 . A appellant makes out no ground for us to inter fere with the refusal of the court at Suecia Term to relieve him, the order is affirmed, wit $10 costs and disbursements. Jenks, P. J., an Thomas, Stapleton, Mills, and Putnam, JJ concur.