Hyperlawhypertext legal database Gilmore v. Hirschman 158 N.Y.S. 1116

← Cases

Gilmore v. Hirschman

158 N.Y.S. 1116 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1916-04-25 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1116
Lydia GILMORE, respondent, v. Stuart HIRSCHMAN, appellant; James A. Hennessy et al., defendants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
April 25, 1916.)

The motion for reargument is denied. In its disposition of the appeal, the court was necessarily limited to the record in the case. If Hirschman deems that he is entitled to relief on account of the order of this court in the proceeding relating to the assessment, an opportunity for a hearing at Special Term in that regard seems to be reserved in the judgment in this action. ■