Hyperlawhypertext legal database Young v. Kingsbury 16 N.Y.S. 950

← Cases

Young v. Kingsbury

16 N.Y.S. 950 Court N.Y. Gen. Term Decision date 1891-12-14 English

Delivered by Pratt, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 950
Young, Respondent, v. Kingsbury, Appellant.
(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.
December 14, 1891.)

Headnote

Appeal from circuit court, Westchester county.
Action by Mary L. Young against Joseph A. Kingsbury to recover the balance of the purchase price of a promissory note.
Argued before Barnard, P. J., and Dykman and Pratt, JJ.
Joseph F. Daly, for appellant. Allen Taylor, for respondent.

The judge’s charge correctly set forth the law, and the verdict of the jury is supported by the evidence. The defect in the satisfaction piece was waived, and defendant’s liability attached. Judgment affirmed, with costs..