Hyperlawhypertext legal database Sperry v. Hellman 16 N.Y.S. 954

← Cases

Sperry v. Hellman

16 N.Y.S. 954 Court N.Y.C.P. Decision date 1891-11-04 English

Delivered by Bischoff, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 954
Sperry, Respondent, v. Hellman, Appellant.
(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.
November 4, 1891.)

Headnote

Motion for reargument. For former opinión, see 13 N. Y. Supp. 899 .
Seligman & Seligman, for appellant. Howard A. Sperry, for respondent.

The motion papers do not disclose any of the grounds specified in rule 16 of the general term rules upon which a reargument may be allowed, and this motion is for that reason denied. The question involved in this appeal is, however, of sufficient importance to merit the attention of the court of appeals, and respondent may, if he desires it, have leave to appeal tothát court. No costs of this motion.