In re Smith's Estate

The petition for the probate of this will alleged that the deceased died at Harmony, Chautauqiia eoúnty, December 13,1889, leaving personal property not exceeding in value $2,500, and real estate not worth over $4,000. Deceased left no widow, but one niece, Mrs. C. C. Hawley, his only heir at law, and made his will dated FTovember 28, 1889, and appointed Emeline Gaynor, his housekeeper, sole executrix thereof, whicli will was duly probated February 3, 1890, and letters testamentary issued to her. The following are the material portions of such will:

“After all my debts are paid in full, I do then give and bequeath unto Emeline Gaynor, of the said town of Harmony, being now my housekeeper, all of my real and personal property, of every name and nature, that I may have at my decease. One thing amongst the property is hereby mentioned, to-wit, the insurance that I have obtained on my life of two thousand dollars in the Chautauqua Mutual Life Association; that is, two one-thousand dollar policies

“Jesse B. Smith.

Emeline Guvnor died intestate September 6,1891, and no administrator has been appointed of her estate. She left, her surviving, two sons, said William and John Gaynor, by a former husband, her only heirs at law. She, as such executrix of the estate of Jesse B. Smith, deceased, made no inventory of the estate, and has never accounted, and such estate remains unsettled. On October 5, 1891, John C. Lewis was duly appointed general guardian of the person and property of said William Gaynor, minor, now aged 12 years, and duly qualified. The petition for such appointment alleged the value of the personal property of such minor was about $500, and annual rents of his real property not over $125. The petition for the appointment of said John 0. Lewis as administrator with the will annexed of the estate of said Jesse B. Smith was made and filed October 5,1891. No citation was issued upon such petition, but such general guardian, and the petitioner herein, and said John Gaynor, and William Gaynor by his special guardian, W. L. Sessions, duly appeared personally and by counsel, and asked the surrogate to give judicial construction to said will as to whether or not the testator gave all his property, real and personal, to Emeline Gaynor, now deceased, or only the use thereof during her life, and the balance to her said two sons, William and John. No one appeared for the estate of Emeline Gaynor, deceased, no administrator or executor of her estate having been appointed. The persons so appearing claimed, and it was not denied, that all the debts owing by Jesse B. Smith at his death had been fully paid. I do not think that such claims are conclusive as to creditors, as the executrix had not advertised for claims, and had not filed an inventory. No objection was made to the appointment of John C. Lewis as such administrator, except that the will gave all the property to said Emeline, and that therefore no such administrator was necessary.

I do not think that the surrogate court has jurisdiction to give construction to the will in this proceeding, even by the consent and request of all parties interested. To do so would be a mere Lrulum fulmén. That surrogate courts have authority to construe wills on the judicial settlement of estates has been often held by the court of appeals and supreme court, as incident to the authority expressly given to settle and make disti ibution of estates. Riggs v. Cragg, 89 N. Y. 479 ; Purdy v. Hayt, 92 N. Y. 446 ; Du Bois v. Broum, 1 Dem. Sur. 317; In re Verplanck, 91 N. Y. 437 ; In re Thompson, 5 Dem. Sur. 117. Section 2624 of the Code gives to surrogate courts full jurisdiction to construe wills on probate relating to personal property, and it.has been held that sections 2622, 2623, 2627, 2629, 2481, subd. 11, and 2482, give surrogate courts auttiority to construe wills on probate relating to real estate. In re Marcial, (Surr.) 15 N. Y. Supp. 89 ; In re Look, (Surr.) 5 N. Y. Supp. 50 , affirmed by court of appeals 125 N. Y. 762 , 27 N. E. Rep. 408 ; In re Delaplaine, 5 Dem. Sur. 402. The authority to appoint administrators with the will annexed by surrogate courts is granted by section 2643 of the Code in the several cases therein mentioned, of which this is one provided for, which section says that the surrogate must, upon application for such purpose, upon notice to be given to creditors and other persons interested, as the surrogate