← Cases

Hirshberger v. Manhattan Ry. Co.

18 N.Y.S. 955 Court General Term. Decision date 1892-03-14 English

Contents

Majority

p. 955
Hirshberger, Respondent, v. Manhattan Ry. Co. et al., Appellants.
(Superior Court of New York City,
General Term.
March 14, 1892.)

Headnote

Appeal from special term.
Action by Eliza L. Hirshberger against the Manhattan Railway Company and another.
Argued before Sedgwick, C. J., and Dugro and Gildersleeve, JJ.
Joseph E. Lord, for appellants. Charles A. B. Pratt, Jr., for respondent.

The questions raised by the appellants in this case are the same that have been decided unfavorably to them in Seebach v. Railroad Co., 18 N. Y. Supp. 208 , (argued this term.) Judgment affirmed, with costs.