Hyperlawhypertext legal database McSorley v. Prague 18 N.Y.S. 955

← Cases

McSorley v. Prague

18 N.Y.S. 955 Court General Term. Decision date 1892-01-29 English

Contents

Majority

p. 955
McSorley, Respondent, v. Prague, Appellant.
(Superior Court of New York City,
General Term.
January 29, 1892.)

Headnote

Appeal from judgment on report of referee.
Action by Alexander McSorley against John G. Prague to recover a balance on an account for plumbing work.
Argued before Freedman, McAdam, and Gildersleeve, JJ.
Charles W. Dayton, for appellant. Hatch & Warren, for respondent.

We find no errors in the rulings of sufficient weight to warrant a reversal. The testimony satisfactorily sustains the findings of the referee, and justifies the judgment rendered. For the reasons set forth in the opinion of the referee, the judgment is affirmed, with costs.