Hyperlawhypertext legal database Lange v. Manhattan Ry. Co. 19 N.Y.S. 1022

← Cases

Lange v. Manhattan Ry. Co.

19 N.Y.S. 1022 Court General Term. Decision date 1892-07-05 English

Delivered by Dugro, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 1022
Lange, Respondent, v. Manhattan Ry. Co. et al., Appellants.
(Superior Court of New York City,
General Term.
July 5, 1892.)

Headnote

Action by Louise Lange against the Manhattan Railway Company and the Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company.
Argued before Dugro and Gildersleeve, JJ.
Davies, Short & Townsend, for appellants. Byram L. Winters, for respondent.

The defendants endeavored to prove their defense upon the cross-examination of plaintiff before the plaintiff had rested. In refusing to allow this, the court committed no error. The case was fairly tried, and no error appears which requires reversal.

The judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.