McGuire v. Byrnes

section was considered by the special term inapplicable to the civil service oí the city of Hew York, on account of the provision contained in the act of 1882 under the rule followed in the case of McKenna v. Edmundstone, 91 N. Y. 231 . But that decision, while very broad, proceeded upon the force and effect of chapter 379 of the Laws of 1875, applicable only to the city of Hew York, which was held for that reason not to have been affected by chapter 486 of the Laws of 1880, making provisions for the creation and enforcement of mechanics’ liens in the cities of the state of Hew York. The completeness of the preceding provisions, as well as the course of legislation, formed ground for the decision which was made, holding that the later law had not repealed the former, even though in this manner made applicable to the cities of the state. The act (chapter 354, Laws 1883) providing for a system of civil service selections and appointments was not in this way affected by any pre-existing complete legislation applicable to the city of Hew York as that upon which this decision proceeded, and there is reason, therefore, for distinguishing this case from that authority, especially as by section 8 of the act of 1883 the mayor of each city in the state having a population of 50,000, or over, as shown by the last census, was brought within the provisions of this law. As it was then enacted, however, it was not mandatory upon the several cities ■of the state, but it was permissive. But by section 8, as that was amended by chapter 410 of the Laws of 1884, it was made mandatory upon the mayor of each city in the state to prescribe regulations for the admission of persons into the civil service of each city, and he was directed within two months after the passage of the act to cause to be arranged in classes the several clerks and persons employed in the public service of the city of which he is mayor, and to include in one or more of such classes all subordinate clerks and officers in the public service of the city to whom his power under the act extended. And after the termination of three months from the passage of the act of 1884 it was declared that no officer or clerk shall be appointed, and no person shall be admitted to, or be promoted in either of the said classes .now existing, or that may be arranged hereunder pursuant to said rules, until he has passed an examination, or is shown to be exempt from such examination, in conformity with such regulations. And if the city of Hew York can be exempted from the general language of this enactment, then each of the ■other cities in the state may be likewise exempted, where provision is made by its charter, or laws affecting such city, for appointments to the office, or ■employments, mentioned and described in this act. And in that manner the act, so far as it relates to the cities of the state, is capable of being wholly nullified and rendered nugatory by the courts. These acts have not been understood to be subject to this infirmity. They were enacted with care and de.liberation; and the two acts already referred to, enacted in the years 1883 and 1884, and chapter 357 of the Laws of 1884, were approved by the governor of "the state, now the president of the United States, and that of 1886 by the present governor. And under their sanction and authority the present rules and regulations have been adopted and followed for making appointments within the provisions.of these laws, and that certainly is a practical construction of so much of them by the public authorities as relates to the cities of the :state, and within such cities is included the city of Hew York. But by the act of 1886 preference has been given to honorably discharged persons who served in the army or navy of the U nited States in the late war, for appointments only to positions in the civil service of the cities affected by the act, and the acts thereby amended, while by the act of 1884, as well as by so much of the act of 1883 as was not amended or changed, a distinction has been made between appointments"and promotions. It was provided by subdivision 3 of section 2 of the act of 1883 that there should be a probationary period before any absolute appointment or employment should take place. And by subdivision 4 it was declared that promotions from the lower grades to the higher

shall be on the basis of merit and competition, which is much the same as the-, section already mentioned of the act of 1882. Subdivision 8 of section 2 off the act of 1883 also provides that notice shall be given to the commission off the person selected for appointment; and section 7, of the same act, by its» language, distinguishes between appointments and promotions by declaring that no officer or clerk shall be appointed, and no person shall be admitted to, or promoted in, either of the classes until he has passed an examination, or-is shown to be exempt. Section 8, as it was amended in 1884, has followed, this distinction by providing for and regulating both appointments and promotions. In that theory it has declared that, after the termination of three-months from the passage of the act of 1884, no officer or clerk shall be appointed, and no person shall be admitted to, or be promoted in, either of the classes existing until he has passed an examination, or is shown to be exempt. This distinction is further manifested by the directions contained in section-. 14 of the act of 1883, forbidding any person seeking a nomination or appointment for any public office to use official authority to secure or aid any person, in securing any office or public employment, or any nomination, confirmation, promotion, or increase of salary, upon the considerations or conditions mentioned in the act, and from using any promise, or threatening to use his authority or influence, directly or indirectly,.affecting a nomination, public employment, confirmation, or promotion, or for the removal, discharge, or promotion of any officer.or public employe. And section 15 of the same act has-still further proceeded as to appointments upon the same plan of legislation. These provisions of the law evince the intention and understanding of the-legislature to have been that in the use of the word “appointment,” as that has generally been employed in this legislation, it was'intended to limit it to-appointments as distinguished from promotions. The words themselves are generally so understood when they are employed in this manner, a promotion, being the advancement of an official or employe to a higher position who had previously been appointed to one of an inferior degree. The language has-been so employed in this legislation as to contrast one position with the other, and to designate by the word “promotion” a different ofBce from that described or intended to be included within the word “appointment.” And in the construction of the law the court is bound to carry out this theory as long as it has been evinced in this manner in its enactment. The intention of the • legislature is to be followed, and that intention is to be discovered by the language employed in the enactment of the statutes, and their various provisions. People v. Hyde, 89 N. Y. 11 , 18. And where words are employed in. the law, as they are in this instance, distinguishing one class or rank from an- - other, they are to be so construed and carried into effect, and the higher rank is not to be comprehended by words describing the lower, even though it. might be otherwise, if only general language, without distinguishing one rank., from another, bad been employed. Wakefield v. Fargo, 90 N. Y. 213 , 218,. 219. It was undoubtedly a defect in the act of 1884 when it secured a preference to positions in the civil service of the cities, as well as the state, to persons who had been honorably discharged from the army and navy in this manner, that it confined the preference to appointments only, and was not made-to include promotions as they were mentioned in the other sections of the law. And the same defect was continued in like manner by the enactment of chapter 29 of the Laws of 1886. They accordingly cannot be held, in view of the language of the acts and the distinction preserved between appointments and promotions, to include the latter class of cases, but they must be made under the authority of the law of 1882, and that has limited the grounds upon wffiich promotions shall take place in the police force of the city of New York to meritorious police service and superior capacity, which excludes the preference-claimed in behalf of the relator in this case. On this ground the decision from which the appeal has been taken appears to be supported, and it should.

be affirmed; but under these peculiar provisions of the laws applicable to the case it should be without costs.

Van Brunt, P. J„ and Brady, J., concur.