Majority
Headnote
1. Legacy Tax—Bequest to Executor.There were three executors named in the will, all of whom qualified. To each of those who should qualify and act the testator bequeathed
The bequests of $500 each to the several charitable institutions are also exempt, because payable at the end of a year from the date of the lett ers testamentary, and the cash value, therefore, is less than $500, as recently held by me in Re Peck, 9 N. Y. Supp. 465 . The legacy to the institution for the blind is claimed to be also exempt, on the ground that it does not receive pay from patients under any circumstances.' This is alleged on its behalf, and is not controverted. Hence it is exempt as an almshouse, under subdivision 4, § 4, tit. 1, c. 13, pt. 1, Rev. St.,[1] (volume 2, 8th Ed., p. 1083.)
The testator bequeathed to Henry C. Kear, his foreman, who had for many years managed several large farms of his, the sum of $4,000, payable as soon as might be after testator’s decease, upon condition that he should accept the same in full of all unsettled accounts and claims against him, other than the amount of any note or notes he might hold. It was made to appear that the amount of Kear’s claim for services was, exclusive of any such notes, somewhat in excess of the sum bequeathed, but that he was willing to accept the legacy in full. Had no bequest been made in this form, but Kear’s claim had been "left in the class of “all my just debts, ” which a testator usually directs his executors to pay, it would certainly have been exempt from taxation. If he had simply bequeathed $4,000 without the mention of any claim, then it would have been taxable. Where a testator chooses to provide, in the form of a bequest, for the payment of a just debt, with a view, possibly, of obviating any question in the minds of his executors as to its amount or validity, he could do so with great propriety; but by doing it he could not clothe it with the character of a gift. Under the circumstances it will readily be sera that, by this provision of the will, no property is “transferred by deed, grant, sale, or gift,” as contemplated by the first section of this act, to Kear. He simply designates the mode of payment of a debt. It is accordingly held to be exempt from taxation under the act.
1 2 Rev. St. (8th Ed.) p. 1083, § 4, subd. 4, provides as follows: “ Sec. 4. The following property shall be exempt from taxation: * * * (4) Every poorhouse, almshouse, house of industry, * * * and personal property used for such purposes, belonging to or connected with the same. ”