Baker v. New York Central & Hudson River Railway

Majority

p. 986

Baker, Appellant, v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. Co., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department.

November 22, 1892.)

Headnote

Action by John Baker against the New York Central & Hudson River Railway Company for injuries received by defendant’s negligence. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before Mayham, P. J., and Putnam and Herrick, JJ.

Parker & Fiero, (J. Newton Fiero, of counsel,) for appellant. Harris & Rudd, (Hamilton Harris, of counsel,) for respondent.

I cannot see any material difference between this case and that of Arnold v. Canal Co., 125 N. Y. 15 , 25 N. E. Rep. 1064 , and I think the judgment should be affirmed. Neither do I see any reason for writing an opinion. All concur.

Cases cited

Arnold v. President, Managers & Co. of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co. 125 N. Y. 15 N.Y. 1890-12-02 at 25 p. 986