Hyperlawhypertext legal database Henschel v. Harlem Reporter Co. 21 N.Y.S. 1135

← Cases

Henschel v. Harlem Reporter Co.

21 N.Y.S. 1135 Court N.Y. Super. Ct. Decision date 1893-01-18 English

Delivered by DUGRO, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 1135
HENSCHEL v. HARLEM REPORTER CO. et al.
(Superior Court of New York City, General Term.
January 18, 1893.)

Headnote

Action by Haufman Henschel against the Harlem Reporter Company and others.
Argued before SEDGWICK, 0. J., and DUGRO and GILDERSLEEVE, JJ.
Charles W. Dayton, for appellant.
William G. McCrea, for respondents.

A careful examination of the papers fails to show_ any improper exercise of discretion by the court at special term. The original complaint sufficed for one kind of relief. The supplemental complaint is but for more extensive relief. Latham v. Richards, 15 Hun, 129 . Order affirmed, with §10 costs.