Hyperlawhypertext legal database Simerman v. Sickles 22 N.Y.S. 1134

← Cases

Simerman v. Sickles

22 N.Y.S. 1134 Court N.Y. Super. Ct. Decision date 1893-05-01 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1134
SIMERMAN, Respondent, v. SICKLES, Sheriff, Appellant.
(Superior Court of New York City, General Term.
May 1, 1893.)

Headnote

Appeal from jury term.
Action by Joseph Simerman against Daniel E. Sickles, as sheriff, for the wrongful detention of certain tobacco. From a judgment for plaintiff entered on a verdict, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Argued before SEDGWICK, O. J., and FREEDMAN, J.
Hays & Greenbaum, (Emanuel J. Meyers, of counsel,) for appellant.
Jacob Manheim, for respondent.

The exceptions argued upon the appeal relate to the charge and refusal to charge. They are all fully met by considering them in connection with the whole of the charge. Then there appears to have been no error. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.