Hyperlawhypertext legal database Sweeney v. Redmond 24 N.Y.S. 1150

← Cases

Sweeney v. Redmond

24 N.Y.S. 1150 Court N.Y.C.P. Decision date 1893-08-09 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1150
SWEENEY, Appellant, v. REDMOND, Respondent.
(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.
August 9, 1893.)

Headnote

Appeal from first district court.
Action by John V. Sweeney against Ellen Redmond for compensation for services as a physician and surgeon. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff-op-peals.
Affirmed.
Argued before BISCHOFF and GIEGERICH, JJ.
T. E. Tomlinson, (Daniel T. Kimball, of counsel,) for appellant.
John Callahan, for respondent.

The questions presented for solution on this appeal are only those involving facts, in respect whereof there is a conflict of evidence. Careful consideration of the evidence satisfies us that the decision of the justice was-in all respects correct, and therefore the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.