Hyperlawhypertext legal database Smith v. Roblee 26 N.Y.S. 1124

← Cases

Smith v. Roblee

26 N.Y.S. 1124 Court N.Y. Gen. Term Decision date 1893-12-06 English

Delivered by MAYHAM, P. J.

Contents

Majority

p. 1124
SMITH et al., Respondents, v. ROBLEE et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department.
December 6, 1893.)

Headnote

Action by Charles Smith and Patrick Hickey against Hamilton A. Roblee, William J. Hammond, and others.
Argued before MAYHAM, P. J., and PUTNAM and HERRICK, JJ,
C. C. Lester and James W. Lester, for appellants.
A. W. Sheperd, for respondents Smith and Hickey.
Jesse Stiles, for respondents Hammond et al.

On a careful examination of the facts and questions of law raised by the appellants in this case, I think that the judgment should be affirmed, and that a written opinion is not required. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.