Hyperlawhypertext legal database Jacobs v. Howard Insurance 26 N.Y.S. 1133

← Cases

Jacobs v. Howard Insurance

26 N.Y.S. 1133 Court N.Y. Super. Ct. Decision date 1893-12-29 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1133
JACOBS et al. v. HOWARD INS. CO. OF NEW YORK.
(Superior Court of New York City, General Term.
December 29, 1893.)

Headnote

Action by Julius Jacobs and George Easton against the Howard Insurance Company of New York.
Argued before FREEDMAN, McADAM, and GILDERSLEEVE, JJ.
Hatch & Wickes, for appellants.
T. Henry Dewey, for respondent.

The case seems to have been carefully tried and considered by the learned referee, and the judgment directed by him must, for the reasons assigned in his opinion, be affirmed, with costs. The allowance-granted by the special term judge was within the statutory limit, so that there was no abuse of power; neither was there any abuse of discretion;, hence the order must likewise be affirmed, with costs.