Hyperlawhypertext legal database Haines v. Thompson 26 N.Y.S. 1135

← Cases

Haines v. Thompson

26 N.Y.S. 1135 Court N.Y. City Ct. Decision date 1893-12-08 English

Delivered by MCCARTHY, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 1135
HAINES, Respondent, v. THOMPSON et al., Appellants.
(City Court of New York, General Term.
December 8, 1893.)

Headnote

Action by Annie Haines against Denman Thompson and George W. Ryer.
Argued before EHRLICH, C. J., and MCCARTHY, J.
Browne & Sheehan, for appellants.
Dittenhoefer, Gerber & James, for respondent.

We have examined the evidence very carefully, and •find no errors. It involved a question of fact, which was properly and fairly presented to the jury by the trial justice. The jury found for the plaintiff, .and there was sufficient evidence upon which to base their verdict. Judgment should therefore be affirmed, with costs.