Majority
p. 1118SPEARS, Respondent, v. WILLIS, Appellant. (Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department. May 8, 1894.) Argued before MAYHAM, P. J., and PUTNAM and HERRICK, JJ.
Headnote
Action by James Spears against Eben Willis.Swift & Sanford (Theo. H. Swift, of counsel), for appellant.
Ledyard P. Hale, for respondent.
We think the judgment should be affirmed. The opinion written when this case was first before us (Spears v. Willis, 69 Hun, 408 , 23 N. Y. Supp. 549 ), the facts not having been materially changed on the last trial, renders the writing of another unnecessary.