Hyperlawhypertext legal database Meyers v. Stix 28 N.Y.S. 1144

← Cases

Meyers v. Stix

28 N.Y.S. 1144 Court N.Y.C.P. Decision date 1894-05-17 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1144
MEYERS et al., Appellants, v. STIX et al., Respondents.
(Common Pleas of New York City and County, General Term.
May 17, 1894.)

Headnote

Action by George H. Meyers and another against Lena Stix and another. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the general term of the city court. 28 N. Y. Supp. 90 .
Argued before BOOKSTAVER, BISCHOFF, and PRYOR, JJ.
Charles Meyers, for appellants.
Samuel W. Weiss, for respondents.

We see little or no difference between the facts as presented on the former trial (reported in 13 N. Y. Supp. 301 ) and upon this. On the former appeal we held that there was a trilateral agreement between the parties, and we see no reason to recede from that, upon the facts presented in this. We think, therefore, this judgment is proper, and should be affirmed, with costs.