Hyperlawhypertext legal database Klipstein v. New York Elevated Railroad 29 N.Y.S. 1145

← Cases

Klipstein v. New York Elevated Railroad

29 N.Y.S. 1145 Court N.Y. Super. Ct. Decision date 1894-07-02 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1145
KLIPSTEIN, Respondent, v. NEW YORK EL. R. CO., Appellant.
(Superior Court of New York City, General Term.
July 2, 1894.)

Headnote

Action by August Klipstein against the New York Elevated Railroad Company. For former report, see 28 N. Y. Supp. 683 .

The judgment and order should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless the respondent, by stipulation, consents to deduct from the judgment the sum allowed by the jury for interest, and the interest, if any, computed upon such sum from the time of the rendition of the verdict. If such stipulation be given, and reduction made, the judgment and order should be affirmed, without costs upon this appeal.