Hyperlawhypertext legal database Sherwood v. Crane 29 N.Y.S. 1149

← Cases

Sherwood v. Crane

29 N.Y.S. 1149 Court N.Y. City Ct. Decision date 1894-06-20 English

Delivered by FITZSIMONS, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 1149
SHERWOOD, Respondent, v. CRANE, Appellant.
(City Court of New York, General Term.
June 20, 1894.)

Headnote

Action by Grace Sherwood against William H. Crane. Rose & Putzel, for appellant. Howe & Hummel, for respondent.

Was plaintiff’s engagement for-the run of the play only, or was it for the season, which plaintiff says that defendant’s representative stated to her to be for the term from January 30th to the following June 1st? That is a question of fact, and was properly submitted by the trial justice to the jury. Their finding in plaintiff’s favor upon that question is conclusive, and has ample evidence to sustain it. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment, with costs.