and building as aforesaid,—and all in violation of the laws of this commonwealth, to wit, section 474 of chapter 410 of the Laws of 1882.
“Seventh. The defendant Loftus D. Hatton is, and at all the times hereinafter mentioned was, in occupation at the said plaintiffs’ lot and building aforesaid, as a tenant of the said plaintiffs, under a lease from said plaintiffs bearing date April 7, 1892, for the term of three years from May 1, 1892, and as such tenant it was the duty of the said Loftus D. Hatton, on his part, to give the said defendant Simon Goldenberg and the defendants Michael Larkin and James J. Larkin, copartners as aforesaid, and the agents, servants, and employes of the said defendant Goldenberg and the defendants Michael Larkin and James J. Larkin, or either or both of them, full and free permission or license to enter upon the said premises, No. 35 West Fourth street, belonging to these plaintiffs, and in possession of the said defendant Loftus D. Hatton as tenant of the said plaintiffs, as aforesaid, upon due application being made to him for permission so to do, in order that the said defendants Goldenberg, and Michael Larkin and James J. Larkin, copartners as aforesaid, and either or both of them, might properly, safely, and securely shore up said wall of the said building, 35 West Fourth street, when the said defendants, or either or both of them, excavated the land adjacent to the said plaintiffs’ land, and took away the soil thereof, as aforesaid; and that the said defendant Hatton wrongfully, negligently, and unlawfully refused such permission or license as aforesaid to the said defendant Simon Goldenberg and the defendants Michael Larkin and James J. Larkin, copartners as aforesaid, or either or both of them, and to their agents, servants, and employes, or the agents, servants, and employes of either or both of them, so to enter upon the said premises, No. 35 West Fourth street, and properly shore up and protect the said plaintiffs’ wall and building thereon, and otherwise inte 'fered with, hindered, and obstructed the said defendant Simon Goldenberg and the defendants Michael Larkin and James J. Larkin, copartners as aforesaid, or either or both of them, and their agents, servants, and employes, and the agents, servants, and employes of either or both of them, in their work of shoring up and protecting the plaintiffs’ wall and building thereon of the premises, No. 35 West Fourth street, in the city of New York, as aforesa d, and to a certain extent preventing said defendants S'mon Goldenberg, and Michael Larkin and James J. Larkin, copartners as aforesaid, from properly shoring up the said wall, and thereby contributed to the injuries sustained, herein set forth.”
Argued before DALY, C. J., and BISCHOF.F and PRYOR, JJ.Foley & Powell, for appellant.
Edward W. S. Johnston, for respondents.
By the terms of the Code (section 484) it is indispensable to the union of several causes of action in the same complaint—First, that they be of a certain class; secondly, that they be consistent with each other; thirdly, that they affect all the parties; and, fourthly, that they do not require different places of trial. Consisting only of a single count, still the complaint contains the elements of four different causes of action ,■—two against Golden-berg and the Larkins, and two against Hatton. The causes of action, against Goldenberg and the Larkins are—First, that, having a license to enter upon plaintiffs’ premises, these defendants neglected duly to shore up and protect them; and, secondly, that, having, no license, they wrongfully and unlawfully entered upon the premises. The causes of action against Hatton are—First, that he wrongfully refused a license to the other defendants; and, secondly, that he prevented the other defendants from shoring up and protecting the premises. Conceding, for argument, that these four