Hyperlawhypertext legal database Norton v. Matthews 31 N.Y.S. 1131

← Cases

Norton v. Matthews

31 N.Y.S. 1131 Court N.Y. Super. Ct. Decision date 1895-01-07 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1131
NORTON et al., Respondents, v. MATTHEWS et al., Appellants.
(Superior Court of New York City, General Term.
January 7, 1895.)

Headnote

Action by Benjamin A. Norton and others against James W. Matthews and others to set aside an assignment as fraudulent, and for other relief.
For opinion of trial judge at equity term, see 28 N. Y. Supp. 265 .

The appellants having failed to print the evidence given upon the trial by the parties, the findings of fact made by the learned trial judge must be deemed to have been made upon sufficient evidence. The only question raised by the appeal, therefore, is whether the conclusions of law are warranted by the facts as found. Upon a careful consideration of this question we think they are. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion filed below.