Hyperlawhypertext legal database Birch v. Loyd 32 N.Y.S. 1139

← Cases

Birch v. Loyd

32 N.Y.S. 1139 Court N.Y. Gen. Term Decision date 1895-02-11 English

Delivered by DYKMAN, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 1139
BIRCH et al., Appellants, v. LOYD, Respondent.
(Supreme Court, General Term, Second Department.
February 11, 1895.)

Headnote

Action by Birch and another against Loyd.
John G. Van Etten, for appellants. John O. R. Taylor, for respondent.

There are three appeals in this case,—one from the judgment entered upon the verdict in favor of the defendant after a trial at the circuit, one from the order denying a motion for a new trial upon the minutes of the court, and one from an order denying a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence,—and the appeals are all entirely destitute of merit. Justice has been done, and the judgment and order denying the motion for a new trial on the minutes should be affirmed, with costs, and the order denying the motion for a new trial upon newly-discovered evidence should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, without an opinion.