Majority
p. 1139BLUMENTHAL v. EXINER. (City Court of New York, General Term. March 19, 1895.)
Headnote
Action by Isidor Biumenthal against Zacharias Exiner.Gilleran & Ford, for appellant. Steuer & Rosenthal, for respondent.
The question involved was whether the defendant made the promissory notes sued upon. This was submitted to the jury, on conflicting evidence, and, their finding thereon satisfactorily sustained the proofs, the judgment and order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.