Hyperlawhypertext legal database Mead v. New York El. Railroad 33 N.Y.S. 1130

← Cases

Mead v. New York El. Railroad

33 N.Y.S. 1130 Court N.Y. Super. Ct. Decision date 1895-05-06 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1130
MEAD, Respondent, v. NEW YORK EL. R. CO. et al., Appellants.
(Superior Court of New York City, General Term.
May 6, 1895.)

Headnote

Action by Frederick Mead against the New York Elevated Railroad Company and the Manhattan Railway Company.
Davies & Rapallo (Julien T. Davies, Brainard Tolies, and J. C. Bushby, of counsel), for appellants.
Evarts, Choate & Beaman (Joseph H. Choate, W. V. Rowe, and T. T. Sherman, of counsel), for respondent.

The awards herein are supported by a fair preponderance of evidence. The learned trial judge seems to have followed correct principles of law in the trial and determination of the issues raised. We have examined the case with care, and find no substantial reason for disturbing the decision of the court below. The judgment appealed from is affirmed, with costs.