Hyperlawhypertext legal database Pils v. Manhattan Railway Co. 33 N.Y.S. 1133

← Cases

Pils v. Manhattan Railway Co.

33 N.Y.S. 1133 Court N.Y. Gen. Term Decision date 1895-04-11 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1133
PILS, Respondent, v. MANHATTAN RY. CO. et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.
April 11, 1895.)

Headnote

Action by John Peter Pils against the Manhattan Railway Company and others.
Henry J. Hemmens, for appellants.
Leo C. Dessar, for respondent.

We think the judgment is in all respects right except upon the question of the award made, which, upon the evidence, we think was too high, and that it should be accordingly reduced, and the rental damages fixed at $900, and the fee damages at $1,200; and, as so reduced, the judgment should be affirmed, without costs.