Hyperlawhypertext legal database Church v. Manhattan Railway Co. 34 N.Y.S. 1136

← Cases

Church v. Manhattan Railway Co.

34 N.Y.S. 1136 Court N.Y. Gen. Term Decision date 1895-06-14 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1136
CHURCH et al., Respondents, v. MANHATTAN RY. CO. et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.
June 14, 1895.)

Headnote

Action by Charles M. Church and others against the Manhattan Railway Company and others.
Brainerd Tolies, for appellants.
E. M. Felt, for respondents.

Upon an examination of the evidence in this case we think that the fee damage should be reduced to the sum of $5,000. The judgment as modified by such reduction should be affirmed, without costs to either party.